The advanced medical technology will expand human’s life. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse?
Recently, the phenomenon of increasing the period of life by utilizing the sophisticated medical methods and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate among the populations. Although this idea is beneficial as it regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that it can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, there are several reasons why expanding the life period by using the modern medical technology is beneficial. These benefits are rooted in the fact of development. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these merits. Firstly, families are able to be with each other for a long time and the risk of missing one of them has diminished. Furthermore, the technology provides an array of facilities and accessabilities in order to decline the risk of bad injuries, illnesses and some particular ones including cardiovascular diseases and families can focus on their lives instead of bad events.
On the one hand, there is no doubt, enhancing the period of life by using modern techological features and medicine has some opponents. According to recent research undertaken by a prestigious university, developed medical methods leads to increasing the number of elderly people. Hence, societies become less active than past. Moreover, the cost of retaining the old people has increased and put families in big troubles.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of developing the lifetime by using modern and advanced technology are far more outweigh their drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41726618705 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10984485697 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618705035971 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5669734492 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.846153846 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103916786928 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322222740075 0.0925447433944 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486585098089 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0578834768241 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159863469279 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.