With the advancement in technology, the number of computers being used in the field of education has increased. Some people believe that there will be no role of teachers in the classroom. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the relationship between technology and teachers has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “have the teachers been superseded by computers?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that there will be no role of teachers in the classroom, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, traditional teaching methods are bound up inextricably with guided learning, which indicates they lead to both teacher-led lessons and educational material. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between educational strategies and a new lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in fundamental issues. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of major impacts is correlated positively with not only changing public attitude but also curriculum policy reform.
Within the realm of technology, without the slightest doubt, online learning attributes to learning from a distance, in that it would come down to homeschooling, social networking, and the Montessori approach. A salient example of such attribution is a new agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take an alternative solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the current inefficient system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of surveillance and education.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that technology and teachers along with each other are highly beneficial. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72972972973 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25812324141 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 139.433497537 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668918918919 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8470436952 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.461538462 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177182440362 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488309860673 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625018252488 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102502244501 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761461615382 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.