The importance of travel seems to be over rated. Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home. Travel is important for education. To what extent to you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of traveling for education has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is travel important for education?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that brilliant scholars locked themselves at home and travel seems to be overrated, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the scientific standpoint, traveling is bound up inextricably with studying abroad, which indicates they lead to both meeting new cultures and broadening horizons. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and the lifestyle of famous people as well as an exponential increase in educational values. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of constructive impact is correlated positively with not only changing attitude but also academic policy reform.
Within the realm of education and society, without the slightest doubt, prestigious universities attribute to overseas traveling, in that it would come down to international interactions, multicultural education, and building personality. A salient example of such attribution is hidden agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take alternative solutions for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of negative consequences of being homesick.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the advantages of traveling for education outweigh its disadvantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8771331058 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31068575885 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 139.433497537 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.703071672355 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3679670473 50.4703680194 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.461538462 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268864048091 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704250182823 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971359037661 0.071462118173 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159599311077 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153092840801 0.0609392437508 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.25 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 55.0591133005 220% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.