Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of over packed products has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “who is the main responsible to avoiding over packed products?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that it is the responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the environmental standpoint, over packed things are bound up inextricably with humanitarian crisis, which indicates they lead to both soil degradation and awkward scenes. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and a new lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in littering wastes. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of ecological issues is correlated positively with not only surveillance but also globalization.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, extra packaging attribute to awkward scenes, in that it would come down to customer, consumer, and producer. A salient example of such attribution is X, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take an environmental agenda for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint an alternative solution problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of education.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that both the government and individuals are accountable. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65957446809 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31292985894 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677304964539 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3294409449 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.769230769 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160869996855 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444969402645 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719874427368 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963579787581 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114440644844 0.0609392437508 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.