Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of over-packed products has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “who is responsible to avoid extra packaging?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that it is all producer’s responsibility as well as consumers, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the environmental standpoint, over-packed products are bound up inextricably with soil degradation, which indicates they lead to both global warming and ozone depletion. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and an extravagant lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in complex issues. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of damaging impacts is correlated positively with not only forming public attitudes but also regulatory policy reform.
Within the realm of society and culture, without the slightest doubt, awkward scenes attribute to plastic bottles, in that it would come down to candy, burger, and cigarette wrappers. A salient example of such attribution is a hidden agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take an alternative solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of surveillance.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that both consumers and producers are responsible. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72438162544 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27324083403 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 139.433497537 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69964664311 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0376331694 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.615384615 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142122307846 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399085924894 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645237225549 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865597775846 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819823154628 0.0609392437508 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.26 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 55.0591133005 214% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.