The environment we live in is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? What measures?
Recently, the environmental dangers have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “what are the underlying causes?". Whereas it is a widely held view that government is major responsible to combat this, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the environmental standpoint, threats are bound up inextricably with CO2 emissions, which indicates they lead to both global warming and melting icebergs. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and hectic lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in soil degradation. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of destructive influence is correlated positively with not only globalization but also greenhouse gasses.
Within the realm of ecology, without the slightest doubt, attribute to human, in that it would come down to animals, flora, and fauna. A salient example of such attribution is the international agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take an alternative solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of negative dimensions of changing ecology.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that both government and individuals are accountable. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...ich inevitably leads to a moot question “what are the underlying causes?'. W...
^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of ecology, without the slightest doubt, attribute to human, in that it would com...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73703703704 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28627064618 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.7 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3098258119 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.153846154 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141100679934 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040286263005 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555305992628 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917794867265 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891073667344 0.0609392437508 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.