Right amount of motivation and practice can teach one better than the training given to him in classrooms by teachers.
Recently, the effect of motivation and practice has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is classroom training the best method?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that the right amount of motivation and practice along with training by teachers is necessary for learning, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, the traditional schooling system is bound up inextricably with rigid rules, which indicates they lead to both theoretical knowledge and teacher-led lessons. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and a new lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in some fundamental issues. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of any major impact is correlated positively with not only changing public attitude but also extracurricular policy reform.
Within the realm of social skills, without the slightest doubt, modern learning strategies attribute to motivation and self-esteem, in that it would come down to efficiency, effectiveness, and productivity. A salient example of such attribution is a new agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take an alternative solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the current system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of surveillance.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the right amount of motivation and practice along with training by teachers is beneficial. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 303.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69306930693 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25546735931 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656765676568 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4457632624 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.692307692 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159048254808 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467358416181 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758735634959 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106282894474 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997585443738 0.0609392437508 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.