The right amount of motivation and practice can teach one better than the training given to him in classrooms by teachers.
In recent years, the methodology of teaching has altered from the traditional classroom-based training to practice enabled learning by students globally. While some believe that sufficient motivation and continuous practice is vital to effective learning, others oppose this idea. This essay will discuss the reasons why pupils need to be constantly motivated and promoted to learn with practice.
To begin with, one strong argument among those that support traditional training offered by teachers in the classroom setup is that teachers are essential to guide a student using realtime face-to-face interaction. Most parents are still of the opinion that teacher-led training is beneficial for the understanding of students. For example, schools in India continue to function on the notion that teachers are important for imparting proper education, although this trend seems to be waning off.
However, there are several arguments in favour of learning by self-practice, experience and sufficient motivation. If students are adequately motivated coupled with a teacher's intervention when doubts arise, then they are poised to perform better. For example, several schools in the west have adopted a teaching framework, which stresses more on self-practice with periodic mentorship of teachers. Moreover, this has enabled teachers to take virtual classrooms that do not require their physical presence any more. Another reason for adopting this technique is that this enhances a student's self-reliance and improves their problem-solving capability.
To conclude, despite some people lingering to traditional classroom teaching led by teachers, there has been a drastic push for teaching children with practice and using motivation building techniques. In my opinion, this methodology of teaching will be very beneficial and truly revolutionize the teaching process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'practicing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: practicing
...he traditional classroom-based training to practice enabled learning by students globally. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...are adequately motivated coupled with a teachers intervention when doubts arise, then th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, still, then, while, for example, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89010989011 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0751041196 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608058608059 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6364228229 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.692307692 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192721177264 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690327056995 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585275520444 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126992285396 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505037374302 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.