In recent years, the information technology revolution in mass communication has enabled human civilizations to prosper. While some claim that it has impacted negatively, most argue that it has been extremely beneficial and an indispensable part of human connectivity. This essay will discuss both sides and provide reasons why it has been a positive development.
To begin with, one strong argument for a negative effect due to the introduction of newer technologies lies in the loss of employment. As we have transformed from print media, fixed landlines to connected electronic devices capable of storing and disseminating information, many have lost jobs. For example, several newspaper companies have shut down due to loss of revenues as people have shifted to digital apps on their mobiles. Thus, negative effects have been observed to an extent.
However, there are several arguments for the transformation of the way people communicate due to information technology modernization. The Internet, for instance, has allowed people from geographically distant places to not only be connected but also made them more aware of the global events. In addition, it has enabled several new businesses like Google and Facebook to prosper. Contrary to what some people believe, it has provided employment and source of livelihood to millions of people.
To conclude, despite some negative effects of information technology, it has played a cardinal part in shaping the current world we live in. In my opinion, future innovations will benefit people worldwide and usher an even better mass communication business.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49799196787 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13012470719 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630522088353 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7177655672 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.307692308 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165370730544 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595305234714 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532892132986 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970835533189 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291082739165 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.