These days, many people have their own computer and telephone, so it is quite easy for them to do their job at home. Does working at home have more advantages or more disadvantages?
In recent years, there has been a drastic shift in the mindset of professionals who work from home rather than the office room. While some people believe that working from home is highly unproductive and negatively impacts the work, others oppose this idea. This essay will discuss both sides and provide reasons why working from home has several drawbacks.
To begin with, one strong argument for those who believe working from home is beneficial is the flexibility it offers. Professionals like software engineers and writers who predominantly have a desk job, prefer working from home as they mostly do not require their physical presence in the office. For example, application developers work on their projects individually and use online tools to communicate with external stakeholders. In addition, work from home option is convenient for single parents or those that take care of older dependents, which allows them to balance both at their convenience.
However, several arguments support the deleterious effects of working from home on the overall quality of work. Since most people have a family at home, they are more likely to get distracted due to unwanted disturbances or events. For example, if a guest comes unexpectedly, then one is forced to attend to them by compromising the work at hand temporarily. Research suggests that most people are likely to perform better in a focussed environment, where they work with co-workers towards similar objectives. Furthermore, people are prone to lethargy while working at home because there is no one to monitor.
To conclude, despite the flexibility provided by working from home, it invariably lowers an individual's productivity impacting the quality of work. In my opinion, this flexibility should only be opted on a need basis and should not be availed by all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...king from home, it invariably lowers an individuals productivity impacting the quality of w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, then, while, for example, in addition, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27986348123 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87155074455 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600682593857 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.6185675834 50.4703680194 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.5 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300907677125 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111139760986 0.0925447433944 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603114439343 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175370342274 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878969108236 0.0609392437508 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.