In recent years, there has been a dramatic rise in environmental pollution levels globally. While some claim that it is each individual's responsibility, others argue that it is the duty of the government to take measures to counter it. This essay will discuss the reasons why the government should drive this change and alleviate the problem that will endanger the existence of life on planet Earth.
To begin with, one strong argument for individuals leading the fight against pollution is that regardless of policies, it is up to each person to implement them at the grass-root levels. For example, India has banned the use of plastics, but they continue to be used widely in markets even today. Such ignorance is either due to a lack of awareness or unavailability of suitable alternatives. Thus, if most people can abolish its usage, it will have a significant positive impact on the environment.
However, there are several arguments in favour of the government being the main entity that can lead a sustainable change. They have adequate financial, human and material resources available at its disposal to effectively implement legislation that can reduce pollution. For instance, they can allocate funds and upgrade infrastructure to reduce dependence on non-renewable sources of energy by investing in new clean energy sources. Although people can practice this at their level, it will not have a global impact. Therefore, the government should not only bring legislations but also enforce them to ensure mandatory adherence by all citizens.
To conclude, despite the contribution of each individual to assuage pollution concerns, only the government can bring about a significant change. In my opinion, stringent legislations need to be introduced in order to minimize further damage to nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...bally. While some claim that it is each individuals responsibility, others argue that it is...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r to minimize further damage to nature.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34265734266 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04059932681 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618881118881 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.888909963 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174475363887 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561211993779 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349146000193 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101932743131 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250894984522 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.