Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, there has been a dramatic rise in environmental pollution levels globally. While some claim that it is each individual's responsibility, others argue that it is the duty of the government to take measures to counter it. This essay will discuss the reasons why the government should drive this change and alleviate the problem that will endanger the existence of life on planet Earth.
To begin with, one strong argument for individuals leading the fight against pollution is that regardless of policies, it is up to each person to implement them at the grass-root levels. For example, India has banned the use of plastics, but they continue to be used widely in markets even today. This ignorance is either due to a lack of awareness or unavailability of suitable alternatives. Thus, if most people can abolish its usage, it will have a significant positive impact on the environment.
However, there are several arguments in favour of the government being the main entity that can lead a sustainable change. They have adequate financial, human and material resources available at its disposal to effectively implement legislation that can reduce pollution. For instance, the government can allocate funds to reduce dependence on non-renewable sources of energy by investing in new clean energy sources. Although people can practice this at their level, it will not have a global impact. Therefore, the government should not only bring legislations but also enforce them to ensure mandatory adherence.
To conclude, despite the contribution of each individual to assuage pollution concerns, only the government can bring about a significant change. In my opinion, stringent legislations need to be introduced in order to minimize further damage to nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...bally. While some claim that it is each individuals responsibility, others argue that it is...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 5.75862068966 382% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29966329966 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04333151381 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3443981635 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.933333333 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197211351392 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689490505885 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345619430224 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112821325101 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524295178469 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.