People succeed because of their hard work; luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of hard working has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is working overtime necessary to achieve success?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that free time is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the employment standpoint, successful career is bound up inextricably with overtime work, which indicates they lead to both professional qualifications and experiences. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between project deadlines and competitions as well as an exponential increase in financial pressure. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to employee’s motivation, productivity, and promotions alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of having rewarding job is correlated positively with not only full-time employment but also satisfactory performance.
Within the realm of personal lifestyle, without the slightest doubt, social life problems attribute to long working hours, in that it would come down to weaken emotional bonds and family degradation. A salient example of such attribution is children’s depravation, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take insufficient time for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint mental health problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to psychological disorders, memory problems, and even physical activities. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of taking off from work on personal relations and leisure activities.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that work-life balance is essential to attain success. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1207.87684729 152% => OK
No of words: 312.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90064102564 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31402042005 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 139.433497537 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.714743589744 0.580463131201 123% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 379.143842365 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6705804969 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.733333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141667489585 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401893551117 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029814703839 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765650270292 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00608851783953 0.0609392437508 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 55.0591133005 231% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.