Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour.
Therefore working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree
Recently, the phenomenon of Advancing in technology and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of material. I am inclined to believe that developing of automation can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, reducing of working hours can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that globalization, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricable bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramification of both accordingly complicated procedures and advencing in sciense apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, reducing of needs for manual labrours might increase the consequences of human behavior. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of industrial revolution.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benfits of mechanization far outweight its drowbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoit thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al standpoint, reducing of working hours can provide the society with some notice...
^^
Line 4, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t thorny issues potential implications.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78902953586 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33742738487 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696202531646 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3752869595 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.727272727 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133879989406 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415027283492 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478923531611 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647246331343 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027685035415 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.41 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.