ageing people good/bad?
The importance of people growing old was always a debatable topic. Many people claim that ageing people is good to society as they know cultures and traditions compared to present generation. Others reject this notion and argue that it is burden to the government to provide pensions and health care to them. In my opinion, latter proposition appears to be more rational. The following essay would further elaborate both sides with justifying reasons and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To start with, in today's fast running world, present generation people are not aware of most of our ancient life and how they lived. Old people who born at that time will help us to explain the importance of our traditions and cultures. Ageing people will teach us about discipline and how to behave with elders which is lacking in pupil. For example, old people know the correct time and Muhurtham and they follow certain myths to arrange a marriage. This example exemplifies us that old people are useful to us in order to follow our cultures.
On the other hand, increasing in old age people have many problems. Firstly, it leads to more expenditure for health. As people become old, they obtain more and more diseases which is big burden on family members to spend money. And at the same time it puts pressure on government to release new financial budget for health care of old people. Increasing people leads to unemployment and young people commit crime for survival purpose.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that ageing people is bad to society and puts huge pressure on government to bring new policies to take care.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The importance of people growing old was alw...
^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople know the correct time and Muhurtham and they follow certain myths to arrange...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, thus, for example, in my opinion, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93262411348 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5717631297 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560283687943 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5975053406 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9375 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317347180578 0.242375264174 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970677565903 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971483603022 0.071462118173 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187632048426 0.151781067708 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267651998696 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 12.6369458128 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.