With the amount of motivation and practice, people can learn anything that the experts teach in the classroom. Agree or not?
Recently, the impact of motivation and practice on learning has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "can people learn anything with the amount of motivation and practice?". Whereas it is a widely held view that these are not sufficient, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, learning methods are bound up inextricably with mental ability, which indicates they lead to both practical skill and creative thinking. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between adademic study and stimulous mind as well as an exponential increase in performance. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of innovative approach is correlated positively with not only imaginaation but also decision making.
Within the realm of public pesrpective, without the slightest doubt, practice attribute to hard-working, in that it would come down to sucess achievement, remarkable outcomes, and desirable wishing. A salient example of such attribution is classroom courses, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take time consuming for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint unmindful activities problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to long-term memory, vast knowledge, and even inherent talent. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of educational system and teaching methods.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that people can learn anything with sufficient motivation and practice, if they want. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86348122867 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15919303723 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 139.433497537 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.699658703072 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1577619037 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.153846154 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237105289849 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584238206768 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933037836962 0.071462118173 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135129046623 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093290119005 0.0609392437508 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.