Buildings' designs is affecting people's mood.
do you agree or disagree?
The idea of the designs of building influencing people's state of mind is widely debatable around the globe, with many people claiming that it has positive effects. But, some people anxious about the notion and reckon it as unwarranted apprehension. I sternly agree with the former argument.
There are a plethora of arguments which I would consider to substantiate my view. The most preponderant one stems from the fact that masses get attract toward sophisticated and unique infrastructure that offers comfortable sitting arrangement, easy access to toilets, appropriate lighting, and what not, but the beautiful interior, from paintings to color of walls to plantation of flowers enhance also make them satisfactory. Needless to say, all these merits stand masses in good stead, as far as augmenting their psychological well-being is concerned.
Another over facet is that people always found to be more productive in the environment that provides comfort and ease to do work that is mostly absent in traditional buildings.
Hence, it is evident why many are in favor of the aforementioned notion.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of the contemporary designs of the building are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ternly agree with the former argument. There are a plethora of arguments which ...
^^^
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider substantiating'.
Suggestion: consider substantiating
...e a plethora of arguments which I would consider to substantiate my view. The most preponderant one stem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 200.0 242.827586207 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.315 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0240659715 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 379.143842365 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.8538322028 50.4703680194 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.25397266985 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122502659748 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458196366598 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484044579283 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0611870920348 0.151781067708 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590086832651 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.