Can the internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views.

Essay topics:

Can the internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views.

Recently, the phenomenon of the internet’s learning has become a topical debate among all societies. This has generated a critical question “Can the internet exchange with the teacher?” Sociology is widely believed to have been beneficial so far, yet I tend to suggest analyzing the matter more cautiously.

From a social point of view, Distance learning is indeed bound to self-study, which means it might lead to both E-libraries and online courses. As an example, a group of researchers, working at a renowned university, conducted a series of thorough studies to scrutinize the relationship between Electronic devices and education technologies as well as a modern society. Their academic criticism was impressive. Evidently, online coaching and guided learning are positively correlated.

Moreover, in social terms, new learning methods and just-in-time learning are undoubtedly attributable to the traditional education system, which means it can lead to both the remote learning and saving times. A well-known example of such a connection is The World Wide Web. Taking a close look at the aforementioned example can vividly prove that digital textbooks play an integral role in educational equity. This criticism is an indispensable part of the modern lifestyle.

To conclude, I entirely agree on the advantages of the Internet’s learning outweigh its disadvantages; however, as every garden has some weeds, the local authorities and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect and cooperation.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 81, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to outweigh'
Suggestion: to outweigh
...antages of the Internet's learning outweigh its disadvantages; however, as every ga...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73799126638 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34313630068 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659388646288 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7431625058 50.4703680194 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.454545455 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0848434201298 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0265050133734 0.0925447433944 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352240587593 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0516038194013 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443468068583 0.0609392437508 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.