Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and less people use cash. How realistic do you think it is and do you think it is beneficial or problematic?
Nowadays, it is increasingly acknowledged that cashless society is playing a more and more important role in our daily life. While some people believe that using cash is the main consumption way in our society, others advocate that people have to use credit cards more often to replace cash. As far as I am concerned, it is a trend to using credit cards frequently, but cash cannot be fallen into disuse.
People who emphasize the importance of using cash are primarily focusing on it is uneconomic to the process by other cashless means. First at all, there are lots of small transaction must be through the use of cash. In addition, it is more fast and direct. For example, when receiving a tip, people love to see cash instead of a string of number.
Regardless of the symbolic idea behind cash, advocates can find a number of advantages of using credit cards for payment. Firstly, when paying by credit cards, the system would record the transaction; this process not only limits the tax evasion behaviour but also promotes money laundering prevention law. Moreover, it also shortens the time of transactions. For instance, tapping cards can keep the line moving quickly.
In a nutshell, while this controversial topic of the cashless society is still open to debate, I believe that the inevitable result of using credit cards taking place of paying by cash is in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9224137931 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67619310075 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581896551724 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5656888501 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1666666667 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338875535322 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117318886887 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722745724765 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201495818535 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077476564254 0.0609392437508 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.