In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, do you think cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages?
Nowadays, the advent of cashless transactions is controversial and has drawn attention from the public. While many claims that this revolution of a cashless society is more convenient and hassle-free for people, others argue that it has its own demerits. To me, the revolution of credit cards is a significant tool which has brought ease in discharging the daily transactions. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are various benefits of credit cards for people transacting in the modern world. The most conspicuous one is that nowadays, people discharge most of their payments on the run and this feature of credit cards supersedes all other features. Moreover, people now do not need to carry the bulky wallets stashed with the money. For instance, people are not required to stand in long ques of banks to clear their cheques which is a time-consuming and tedious task. Hence, it is apparent that this phenomenon of cashless transactions promotes ease in making payment with just click of a button.
Nevertheless, there are some drawbacks that can overwhelm the potential impact of cashless society. The most alarming one roots from the fact that people suffer from high-interest rates on their credit transactions. Furthermore, offenders hacks the highly sensitive bank information and resort to phishing which is a worrisome issue. In addition, most people are not technology savvy and believe that the currency transactions are a better mode of transacting.
This essay discussed how cashless society saves time in transacting and can cause high penalties and web crimes. In my opinion, the merits associated with cashless payments outweighs its downsides and therefore, shows that technological advances are a boon to people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29757785467 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94179517205 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567474048443 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.7404896193 50.4703680194 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.066666667 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.25397266985 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191550425078 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623585528197 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037657538906 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115082908158 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00544192892549 0.0609392437508 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.