What is your opinion about top executives at companies getting their employees involved in the decision-making process?
It is highly debatable is currently prevailing that do the top executives at companies getting their employees involved in the decision-making process or not. Some people are talking in favor it while some people are against of it. This essay will further discuss both the viewpoints before jumping to actual conclusion.
There are myriad benefits of getting employees involved in decision making. To begin with the positive side, employees are the core part of the management so, they know the focal part where to improve and where not. further, calling an outside person will create a huge amount of expense in terms of time and money. As per the one of the research by the prominent industrialist that it suggests that in any case, internal people do the help in terms of decision making because they know the real facts of the circumstances.
However, there are also certain negative points co-exist with the above points. Firstly, sometimes people do the malpractice and see their own benefits while making a decision which overall creates a loss to the company. further, they may associate with the rivals of the company and earn their share while the company is doing the huge loss. for example, in one of the research, it found that in one of the important decision of the company, the executive has helped their rivals and due to that company has faced a huge loss.
To sum up, with the above-mentioned arguments, involving employees is beneficial but higher authorities should check the sensitivity of matter and then decide that whether they should be involved or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Further
...al part where to improve and where not. further, calling an outside person will create ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Further
... overall creates a loss to the company. further, they may associate with the rivals of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ile the company is doing the huge loss. for example, in one of the research, it fou...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, may, so, then, while, for example, in any case, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95112781955 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67095408114 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548872180451 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3752015534 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286223824887 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107896178897 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14551726882 0.071462118173 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166060929213 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828682668751 0.0609392437508 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.