A cashless society is the one in which people use more Credit and Debit Cards instead of carrying Cash in their wallets. I believe that a community which is cashless has lots of benefits to offer. I will discuss both benefits and drawbacks of the cashless society in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with the demerits, first of all, if the society goes cashless altogether, it can become more spend-thrift. If people carry cards all the time and every shop and vendor has a swiping machine available, people can become impulse buyers and end up purchasing things which they do not even require. Next, as the cards are tiny, they can easily drop from the pockets, and people can lose a lot of money if they do not notice it promptly.
On the contrary, there are plenty of benefits to going cashless. The most significant advantage is that people need not carry bulky wallets all the time. These days, there are Smartphone cases available, which have a card pocket made in them. People can keep all their cards in them and save their pocket space. Furthermore, carrying cards is safer because even if people lose them, they can promptly intimate their Bank to cancel their card on the spot. But, if they have cash in their wallet, and they lose it, they can never get the money back.
Moreover, paying by card saves money in the long run. For example, if we purchase an item for $24.48 and we pay in cash, it gets rounded off, and we are supposed to pay $24.50. But if we tap the card instead, we spend the exact amount. It might not appear to be a significant saving, but when we always use the card to pay for everything, we can save a lot of money.
In conclusion, becoming cashless brings in just a few disadvantages, but if people stay more conscious, they can avail of a plethora of its advantages. Every country should go cashless and lead a secure life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, first of all, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51048951049 5.00649968141 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38664474893 2.71678728327 88% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552447552448 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.931034482759 644% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.315589218 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225958124913 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08536645473 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498726997443 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136738843985 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514105698086 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 12.6369458128 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.1260098522 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.9458128079 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.5310837438 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.32886699507 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.