Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Although such topics, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive agreement dialogue on whether medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy can lead thought-provoking discussions. My view is that irrespective of the numerous arguments that exist on either side, medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. Through the course of the essay, I shall put forth my points and calculations by considering both sides of arguments.
There are a number of reasons in favor of my viewpoint. One of them is that nowadays there is an early detection of life-threatening diseases like a Cancer, Aids which were not possible earlier. This is because now nearly all the hospitals are equipped with the latest technology so people do not have to move from one city to other for the treatment.
There are few aspects of medical technology that need special mentioning. Firstly, it is said that earlier MRI scanners were available only available at the private hospitals, but, now it is also available at the government hospitals so one can take benefit of it. For example, Tuberculosis was incurable in 1990, but with constant efforts of government and the latest medical technology, it has become curable.
I see that there is equally potential evidence to support the arguments I have provided and hence my opinion is that Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. I am inclined to believe that advancement in medical technology has proven the boon for the human’s life expectancy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'yield'.
Suggestion: will never yield
...lthough such topics, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 511, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by considering both sides of arguments. There are a number of reasons in favor o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32142857143 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23783019068 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7054131778 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.909090909 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367878924856 0.242375264174 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144374276344 0.0925447433944 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139939368465 0.071462118173 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224274164792 0.151781067708 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147389197349 0.0609392437508 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.