Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?
Although such topics, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on whether video communication with the doctor help patients to cure disease can lead the through-provoking discussion. My view is that irrespective of the numerous arguments that exist either side, there are more pros than cons.
There are a number of reasons in favor of my viewpoints. One of them is that consulting a doctor through video conferencing makes easier for patients. This is because, with the prior appointment of the doctor, people do not have to wait for a long time and hence, there is a huge saving in term of time, money and energy. It can also be observed that, in the matter of medical emergency, video communication is the fastest way to reach the doctor and patient can get on the spot basic treatment instead of going through the medical van.
As every coin has two sides, video communication with the doctor is also associated with a few disadvantages. Firstly, patient and doctor may have miscommunication and misunderstands the symptoms and causes to treat the disease, and hence online consulting narrows a doctor’s opportunities to diagnose a patient.
I see that there is equally potential evidence to support the arguments I have provided and hence my opinion is that video communication with doctor associated with more pros. I am inclined to believe that it video communication with the doctor will enhance us many grounds though they have a few disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'yield'.
Suggestion: will never yield
...lthough such topics, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat, in the matter of medical emergency, video communication is the fastest way t...
^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'treating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: treating
... misunderstands the symptoms and causes to treat the disease, and hence online consultin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... though they have a few disadvantages.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10040160643 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16755723166 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570281124498 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5824147505 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.25397266985 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363161801871 0.242375264174 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134112782064 0.0925447433944 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860034799586 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227099475794 0.151781067708 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467018746352 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.