In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?

The development of society is marching towards a globalized world where realism of cashless society is an essential formation. It’s undeniable that a lot of potential advantages stem from the effects of credit cards. I strongly agree that usage of credit cards can help society to procure enormous benefits. Both relative advantages and disadvantages of cashless society will be explored in this essay.
On the one hand, the advocates of the credit card ascertain that the positive aspects are manifold. The primary benefit of this is economic growth and they increase the purchasing power of people. If you have a credit card, you can make a purchase even if you do not have sufficient money. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the credit card regulations. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of international system and tracking system apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, the opponents of the effects of credit card claim that the hidden risks cannot be ignored. The first reason to consider is overspending and this can be contributing influence to credit card in debts. Another potential drawback could be, for illustrate or rural people might be very difficult to understand the credit card concepts and bill payment. Thus, the negative ramifications that result from cashless society are obvious.
To sum up, it can be seen that there are strong and valid points on both of the argument and significant of cashless society plays an integral part in the overall development of society.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, if, so, thus, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1953125 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91487924211 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57421875 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0036440777 50.4703680194 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.0 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193209101828 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683428906537 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532281218602 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114110370255 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548765676773 0.0609392437508 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.