In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, what are the positive and negative impact on life and work.

Essay topics:

In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, what are the positive and negative impact on life and work.

Recently, the phenomenon of using credit cards and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of credit card is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that electronic card can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, the master card can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that security enhancement, as well as being secure about money, are inextricably bound up. When I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered social behaviour. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both time saving and online transaction apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of economy, the electronic card might increase the consequences of being stolen from the accounts. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of hacking relate to this reality that the demerits of using online systems pertain to the risk of money. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of using internet for the transaction is correlated negatively with crimes. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the capability of tracing the card.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of e-card far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of money exchange provide the significance of faster and safer environment for work, but also pinpoint cultural implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48062015504 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08729628534 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643410852713 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9376281878 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.833333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0866255342544 0.242375264174 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301663835202 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437682525499 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0493873625932 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417976013591 0.0609392437508 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.