Celebrities have a good influence of youth.
The value of the youth which was always arguable now becomes more open to discussion. The major influence of celebrities has caused the argument over the possible impact of this trend on good influence of the youth in recent years. It can be agreed that celebrities have a good influence on the youth big way. This essay will explained positive points of celebrities influence in youth and thus will lead to logical conclusion.
Basically there are many reasons why celebrities have good influence on the youth, but the most visible reason from the fact that, at precent celebrities like to do more social work tobe famous and they trying to get more attention from them. As an explanation, finding in this area is always shows that, celebrities use social media to upload their photos and news of social works they have done. Celebrities therefore can play important role for a good influence of the youth.
Another reason for confirm this idea is that celebrities use the media to give massages to the society. How to stop drugs, alcohol and they explained bad effects on them. And also they introduce new fashion style for youth. So the youth follow them and try to do good things for them and the society.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of celebrities have good influence on the youth is important, although is has a number of disadvantages that should be well hadle. When people consider about the impact of celebrities influence on the youth it is important to analys the reason and values before reaching a final.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'explain'
Suggestion: explain
...e on the youth big way. This essay will explained positive points of celebrities influenc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ws that, celebrities use social media to upload their photos and news of social w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, therefore, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80740740741 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54636026856 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 400.5 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5463268713 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8461538462 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76923076923 7.25397266985 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.581768466161 0.242375264174 240% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228016632283 0.0925447433944 246% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163759775108 0.071462118173 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.380301322274 0.151781067708 251% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149159168505 0.0609392437508 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.5310837438 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.32886699507 91% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.