Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree?

The importance of introducing music to the kids, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend. It can be strongly agreed upon the fact that different kinds of music have some favourable arguments in favour of promoting the child learning abilities, however, there has always been some contention about it. This essay will further elaborate on both the sides and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

At the outset, there are numerous reasons how specific kind of music can increase the level of learning in children life, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that music helps the students to stay focused to their studies, and this can be contributing fact to make them more sharp minded. As an illustration, the research in this area invariably shows that children who listen to one hour of music every day achieved eighty per cent marks in their final examination. For this reason, the importance of music in enhancing children learning should not be ignored.

Nevertheless, some hold an opposing view and tend to believe that music can impair the learning of students in several ways, but the most preponderant on is that music can distract the students from other non-academic subjects like as, math, science, and history. For example, according to a recent survey done by the Sydney University revealed that the pupils who listen to music every day, have failed in the examination.
Therefore, music can play a vital role in making the students less attentive to their academic heads.

In view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some drawbacks the role of music in increasing the performance level of the candidates is instrumental indeed.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15050167224 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74428115737 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571906354515 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.8109915759 50.4703680194 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202456905725 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734485926012 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604685168221 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970644290163 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585434512917 0.0609392437508 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.