Certain kinds of music promote learning in their life. Do you agree or disagree?
The idea of seeing many schools and educational institutions using certain type of music as a tool of learning in children is widely debated with many people claiming that the benefits it offers are no match for it’s drawbacks. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
One of the most conspicuous aspects is that music helps to enhance the critical thinking and opens new thoughts and ideas in brain. Not only does music help children to develop teamwork abilities and boost their intelligence, but it also helps to learn different languages and culture. Furthermore, music helps to solve any problem outside the box. Needless to say, all these merits stand children in good stead as far as broadening their horizons is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that, thanks to music, it helps to increase literacy level in a country where it is being used to boost learning in children. Furthermore, music is a fabric in our society and it can shape abilities and characters. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of promoting certain types of music.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of music in children’s learning are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 1207.87684729 87% => OK
No of words: 214.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90654205607 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70715256191 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607476635514 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 379.143842365 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2304783645 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206377101534 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794480056315 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409461049603 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119886578588 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310297051671 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.