Some people think that experiential learning (learning by doing) can work well in formal education; however others think that traditional form of teaching is the best. Discuss whether or not you think experiential learning can work well in high school and college?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in seeing my people believe that experiential learning. There is a widespread worry that this would only lead to a myriad of concerns for students learning through experience. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that it helps students to learn from each other through direct experience and real world problems. Not only does this method of learning allow students to observe, review and reflect on their earlier problems, but it also make them more confident and enhance intelligence. Needless to say, all these merits stand students in good stead as far as broadening their horizons is concerned.
Another pivotal of the argument is that experiential learning can be applied in high school or college curriculum set in a variety of campus based, project-based and community contexts. As per many schools of thought, far from encouraging rote learning. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of learning through experience.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of experiential learning are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to allow'
Suggestion: to allow
.... Not only does this method of learning allow students to observe, review and reflect...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
... on their earlier problems, but it also make them more confident and enhance intelli...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 207.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14975845411 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94100154195 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 379.143842365 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6515123279 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9090909091 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 7.25397266985 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178771966365 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624381743106 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558676027986 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1158964861 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462862866038 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.