Some people think that experiential learning (learning by doing) can work well in formal education; however others think that traditional form of teaching is the best. Discuss whether or not you think experiential learning can work well in high school and college?
Experiential learning has sparked a heated debate whether is a better learning method than formal education in classroom. Broadly speaking, experiential learning is learning through practices. During practicing, learner may experience number of trials and errors, this process invokes learner’s emotion, that prompts reflects, changes and mindset. In addition to enhance emotional intelligent ability, combined with collaboration of modified and acquired new skills leading to succeed. Beyond that learner is also acting as an active learner in experiential learning instead of a passive witness in traditional teaching that will encourage learner being a proactive learner in long run. In this essay I will elaborate two sides of notion and will end to my conclusion.
Experiential learning is appealing to many students who are good in learning from hands on experiences, specifically those students are practical learner. They found learning from practicing that allows them to modify and acquire new skills easily. For example, science students learn how to build a robot. Instead of sitting down to learn how to do it from textbook, building a robot by themselves in which allows them to learn problem solving, reflects their strength and weakness, overcome emotion engagement, modified and acquired new skills through practices it. It becomes a well diversify learning opportunity.
Traditional teaching is proven that it is an efficient teaching method. In fact, majority of knowledge and skills inheritance from our ancestors are passing down through traditional teaching. Unfortunately, the defeat of traditional teaching is not applicable to many practical subjects.
In view of arguments I outlined above, I incline to agree that experiential learning is a better method than traditional teaching in practical subject. But the benefits of traditional learning cannot be ignored.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, broadly speaking, for example, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73498233216 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06525646164 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579505300353 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.0775133186 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4375 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253070061692 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994544991988 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751940797553 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156079492801 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456932179256 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.