Cheap overseas travel does more damage than good

Essay topics:

Cheap overseas travel does more damage than good

In this modern world, air travel is essential for job, tourism and business. Due to the advancement of technology, traveling by air is inexpensive in the present scenario. Traveling in a low-cost air travel is a positive development for the mankind. Although, I disagree to this statement to a larger extent.
To begin with, traveling across the countries with cheaper rates is undoubtedly the positive thing. The foremost reason is that the person can travel without hesitations. If the air travel cost is higher, then the issues which are to be solved personally get difficult. For example, in any industries if the problem arises with any instrument, we have to call the overseas expert. Due o cheaper rates of traveling the representative of the company can travel to the problem site without any hesitation.
Furthermore, cheaper rate of foreign travel also encourage people to visit other countries as tourists. The person fond of travelling and admiring the new cultures seek the less amount of travel cost. For example, my one of the friends likes to travel and see other country’s culture. Because of higher rates of travel expenses, he could not travel some countries. Therefore, less travel expenses tend people to travel more in the foreign countries.
In conclusion, the traveling from one country to another is necessary and ordinary these days. Advantages of having cheaper rates of travel expenses outweigh the disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'low-cost air travel'.
Suggestion: low-cost air travel
...e in the present scenario. Traveling in a low-cost air travel is a positive development for the manki...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...a positive development for the mankind. Although, I disagree to this statement to a larg...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23175965665 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93339397896 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55364806867 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 15.3398989566 50.4703680194 30% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.1875 104.977214359 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5625 20.9669160288 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196337843198 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768110076399 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411558753297 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123851036767 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339314587509 0.0609392437508 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 12.6369458128 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.9458128079 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.