child workers and paid job
Recently, the phenomenon of the involvement of children in paid works and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the valuable work experience is highly beneficial, such issue might be regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that taking resposibility can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, engaging children in paid jobs can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that volunteers and community services are intertwined inextricably with not only the social welfare but also social interactions. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered learning how to save money. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both socioeconomic impacts and child workers apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychological science, children involvments in paid works might increase the consequences of mental disorders. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the potential abilities would relate to this reality that the demerits of the mind pertain to damaging the learning process. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of exhausted children is correlated negatively with school attendance. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of mental diseases.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of engaging children to do a paid job far outweigh its benefits. Not only do the disadvantages of taking responsibilty prove the significance of job dissatisfaction, but also pinpoint its crucial implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70437956204 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35461024234 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627737226277 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2190459143 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190102059809 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534614977687 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597378690281 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981863490235 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612635389404 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.