Some people believe the large shopping malls are replacing local shops which is bad for local economies. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of large shopping malls and its corresponding impact on local economics has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that local shops are highly beneficial, such issue might be regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that replacing with malls can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economic standpoint, the big shopping malls can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that a higher employment rate and social welfare are intertwined inextricably with not only lower unemployment rates but also cost-effective issues. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered discount seasons for brand stores. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the supple-demand balance and economic factors in big malls apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of local community science, the replacements of local shops by malls might increase the consequences of worsening local economy. Moreover, fundamental aspects of private shops owners would relate to this reality that the demerits of small capitals owned by locals pertain to destruction. As a tangible example, a scientific study undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of perished local stores is correlated negatively with traditional skills. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the private companies located in local community.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly beileve that the benefits of the large shopping malls far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of local shops prove the significance of economic conditions, but also pinpoint its crucial implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61754385965 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1487274345 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624561403509 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4087704051 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.416666667 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342517755653 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120273895608 0.0925447433944 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789056016049 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198505310303 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663733127319 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.