When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of productivity, and have made us less happy and more stupid because information is not knowledge. Which of these points of view do you agree? Support your argument with reasons and examples from your own experience and observations.
Recently, the phenomenon of computers and whether it brings productivity or laziness has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that providing goods is highly beneficial, such issue might be regarded both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that information can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the technological standpoint, computers can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that nimble laptops and technologically advanced gadget are intertwined inextricably with not only productivity but also fast services. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered user-friendly gadget. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both technological improvements and computer helps apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of health science, computer might increase the consequences of obesity. Moreover, fundamental aspects of sitting in front of computers would relate to this reality that the demerits of online orders pertain to fewer physical activities. As a tangible example, a scientific study undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of gaining weight is correlated negatively with convenient tools. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of health problems.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of computer influences far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of making us happier prove the signnificance of productivity, but also pinpoint its crucial implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-05 | Primace | 77 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2019-05-07 | 029ashish@gmail.com | 72 | view |
| 2019-04-16 | ajayaryanone | 77 | view |
| 2019-03-29 | Ammu helen | 77 | view |
- The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn’t waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statem 55
- keeping animal in zoos and animal rights 88
- Some people believe the large shopping malls are replacing local shops which is bad for local economies. What is your opinion? 88
- Some people work for long hours to achieve success and some give importance to free time. compare and discuss these issues. 88
- The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn’t waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statem 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80079681275 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35697977139 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673306772908 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7047487736 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171126208715 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519851123681 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356820426124 0.071462118173 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896856351342 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185504121851 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.