keeping animal in zoos and animal rights
Recently, the phenomenon of the animal rights and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that keeping them in zoos is highly beneficial, such issue might be regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that helping animals is a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the environmental standpoint, keeping animals in zoos can provide the environment with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that green house gases and gas emissions are intertwined inextricably with not only extinctions but also the freedom of animals. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the environmental effects. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both damaging the environment and hurting animals apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of biological science, keeping animals in captivity might increase the consequences of dangerous species. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the ecosystem would relate to this reality that the demerits of preying animals pertain to a dangerous wild life. As a tangible example, a scientific study undertaken by a prestigious univesity has asserted that the downside of the existing predators is correlated negatively with saving animals. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of nurturing animals in zoos.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of zoos far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of helping weak animals prove the significnace of the animal rights, but also pinpoint its crucial implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5977443609 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17873760698 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624060150376 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.857644809 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.083333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418057649824 0.242375264174 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131431018519 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792736577419 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230540815593 0.151781067708 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424656421881 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.