age discrimination against older workers
Recently the phenomenon of discrimination against older workers and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that a person's age is highly beneficial such issue might be regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being unfairly dismissed can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, the age discrimination in the workplace can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that elderly workers and valuable experiences are intertwined inextricably with not only social developments but also winning promotions. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered socio-economic impacts. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both aging employees and the social progression apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of economic science, discrimination against older workers might increase the consequences of higher unemploment rates. Moreover, fundamental aspects of pensioners would relate to this reality that the demerits of inflation rates pertain to ageing-related health problems. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of age discrimination in workplaces is correlated negatively with the company's profit. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of economic situations.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of age discriminations far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of economic impacts prove the significance of #, but also pinpoint its crucial implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89353612167 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4443546524 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642585551331 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2409883676 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.166666667 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340173781526 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107461166414 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1207920511 0.071462118173 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186838893439 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801068074232 0.0609392437508 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.