Children should learn good handwriting, or typing at school, which one is more important?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning good handwriting, or typing at school and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures, is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the educational writing program can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the vivid handwriting can provide the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university researcher, I performed an academic investigation, which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and complicated procedures can be seen.
Within the realm of the public arena, fast writing in school might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the school curriculum could relate to this reality that demerits of typing pertain to pupil capabilities in school. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is highly correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume that the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning handwriting techniques in school far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique educational programs prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to handwrite'.
Suggestion: to handwrite
...y believe that the benefits of learning handwriting techniques in school far outweigh its d...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t thorny issues potential implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77323420074 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26134826903 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669144981413 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6756455092 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.416666667 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150015715173 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498836508431 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812380582437 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813398868248 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426073270852 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.