Cities are expanding and government should focus on building better network for public transport rather than building roads for vehicle. Do you agree or not?
here is a great upsurge in urbanization in the last few decades. Due to increasing population cities are expanding, which in turn making roads for vehicles congested. Some people opine that the government should build more roads, whereas, others reckon that it should focus on a better network for public transport. My opinion coincides with the latter notion. This essay will elaborate on the viewpoints and hence lead to a reasoned conclusion.
There is a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that focusing more on mass transportation can actually reduce the problem of pollution. Increasing private vehicles are generating colossal of harmful gases, which in turn is damaging our environment. Hence, providing individual better facilities in public transport can decrease personal vehicles on the road. For example, expanding the network of public transport will result in convenient and faster travel to destination. Hence, it is quite clear that the government should develop more sources of mass transportation.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that traveling through a private vehicle is more costly than public transport. Therefore, a better arrangement of mass transport can save people a lot of money. For instance, more frequent route of trains can be convenient for the office going people and can save their money because they have to travel on a daily basis. In addition, it can help the group of people who are unable to afford a personal vehicle. Hence, the expansion of mass transport has become inconspicuous in the present scenario.
In view of the arguments outlined above, it can be concluded that the government should spend more budget on public transport rather than building more roads.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Here
here is a great upsurge in urbanization in t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, hence, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25177304965 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8502367277 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549645390071 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3955868668 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1176470588 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332598798756 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919997201189 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103100264728 0.071462118173 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212652316617 0.151781067708 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592537153075 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.