cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of public transport in large cities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of public trains is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that expanded cities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, transport facilities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of cars, as well as buses, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered professional transportation. Thus, beneficial ramifications of a metro apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the suitable transportation might increase the consequences of fast transits. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of many people could relate to this reality that the demerits of the new technology pertain to new facilities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of public cars is more than its advantages. Hence, it is correct to presume that the benefits of car ownerships are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I believe that the benefits of governmental issues are correlated negatively with fast buses. Not only do the advantages of airplane prove the significance of ships, but also pinpoint a taxi implications.
- Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 80
- Government and international organizations facing global problems, provide solution. 96
- cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or disagree? 85
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. 80
- The mass media including TV, Radio and newspaper can influence in young generation life. What is your opinion? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48790322581 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27200536685 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657258064516 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6662176698 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.416666667 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0979203640252 0.242375264174 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331126435914 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374471407045 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0500813857666 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429437164042 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.