Is the experience the best teacher?
Recently, the phenomenon of experiences as the best teachers and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of social experiences is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning methods can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning by experiences can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of training systems as well as learning methods are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered student’s experiences. Thus, beneficial ramifications of study experiences and prospective tutors apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, effective personal experiences might increase the consequences of tremendous educational effects. Moreover, fundamental impacts of life experiences could relate to the reality that the demerits of educating pertain to teaching. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the best tutors is correlated negatively with educational activities. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of students’ abilities.
To conclude, although there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the impacts of educative experiences far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of perfect learning activities prove the significance of school experiences, but also pinpoint skilled teachers’ methods implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94488188976 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43265546862 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645669291339 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7886778982 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.833333333 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294356184127 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949453404162 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097144482972 0.071462118173 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16247312803 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054962011088 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.