Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss
Recently, the phenomenon of the suitable time for working and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of good job is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded in thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that lifestyle can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the time management between the work and personal life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of full time careers, as well as half-time careers, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of the family. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both jobs and the life apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, spending acceptable time at work might increase the consequences of being an earner. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the personal time could relate to this reality that the demerits of jobs pertain to financial problems. As a tangible example, some academic research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of financial impacts are correlated negatively with being with family. Hence, it is correct to suppose that the advantages of suitable wages are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I prefer to suppose that the benefits of holidays are more than its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of working hardly prove the significance of casual jobs, but also pinpoint personal satisfaction implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...h are rooted in the fact that merits of full time careers, as well as half-time careers, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36431226766 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07315125687 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617100371747 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0732290043 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205665201376 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638325357555 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745849880936 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108876166858 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377886730819 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.