Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Resently, the phenomenon of decorated buildings and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of lifestyle is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the impact of living in a modern house can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, designing of buildings can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that demerits of old fashion designs, as well as buildings, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered negative life. Thus, beneficial ramifications of positive life apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, modern buildings might increase the consequences of better lifestyle. Moreover, fundamental aspects of apartments could relate to this reality that the demerits of complexes pertain to houses. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of architects is more than its advantages. Hence, it is correct to believe that quality in life and work are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, it is correct to suppose that the benefits of beautiful houses is more than its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of tall towers prove the significance of ancient houses, but also pinpoint the decoration implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42168674699 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14461678107 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642570281124 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0252524456 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173964360183 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536668457407 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442870034323 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841615302489 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546545892598 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.