Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest?
Recently, the phenomenon of student workers and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of homework is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded in thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that time limitations can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, casual jobs for students can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of financial supports, as well as work experiences, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered prosper students. Thus, beneficial ramifications of jobs for students apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, working during the education period might increase the consequences of studying. Moreover, fundamental aspects of working could relate to this reality that the demerits of financial situations pertain to working times. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of the education is correlated negatively with personality. Hence, it is correct to suppose that the advantages of family supports and being an earner are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I believe that the benefits of temporary careers for students are more than its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of hard working prove the significance of the study, but also pinpoint student implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53937007874 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15821903115 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649606299213 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8420908976 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19463515856 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612104821722 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379790186128 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102557436858 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163928981044 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.