The mass media including TV, Radio and newspaper can influence in young generation life. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of informative medias and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of information is highly beneficial, such issue regarded in both thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the television can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, a public media can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of radio, as well as newspaper, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the saving time. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both professional media and information apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, influencing of media on young people might increase the consequences of youthful. Moreover, fundamental aspects of new generation could relate to this reality that the demerits of the wasting the time pertain to entertainment. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of advertisements is correlated negatively with useful programs. Hence, it is not correct to suppose that the advantages of the news and programs are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I believe that the benefits of the mass media is more than its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the public broadcasting prove the significance of the age, pinpoint the media influences implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48235294118 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29134804204 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63137254902 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6364344457 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16182925321 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504100148655 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442869767691 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858059073005 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256451490899 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.