In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop.
Recently, the phenomenon of shopping centers and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of supermarkets is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that small shops can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, hypermarkets can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of local shops, as well as retailers, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of malls. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the selling and buying apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, large shops might increase the consequences of financial impacts. Moreover, fundamental aspects of e-shops could relate to this reality that the demerits of small shops in the country pertain to big shops in the city. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the drawbacks of developed markets are correlated negatively with suitable trading. Hence, it is correct to suppose that the advantages of traders are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I believe that the benefits of wholesale's markets are more than its downsides. Not only do the advantages of big malls prove the significance of financial impacts, but also pinpoint smaller traders implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47222222222 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13680624425 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646825396825 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0405176734 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.916666667 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206022222973 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633491703025 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863620300719 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10310602417 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867638415496 0.0609392437508 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.