In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of replacing the small local shop in town and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such an issue regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the large shopping mall in cities can be a plus that I will analyze throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the differences between the large shopping mall and the small local shop provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly this complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the replacement process of the small local shop in town might increase the consequence of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of non-creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of increasing large shopping mall in cities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60465116279 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18745371515 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631782945736 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9958675789 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.454545455 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243454012639 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883773698926 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970368182366 0.071462118173 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144188347215 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033659901987 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.