Medical technology is responsible for a human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of medical technology's responsibilities for a human's life expectancy and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate, although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined that a human's life expectancy can be a plus that I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, medical technology management in a human's life expectancy can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, medical technology analysis in a human's life expectancy might increase the consequence of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of non-creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, there are several arguments on both sides, but I profoundly believe that the benefits of the responsibilities of medical technology far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ical technologys responsibilities for a humans life expectancy and its corresponding i...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 379, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...er of individuals. I am inclined that a humans life expectancy can be a plus that I wi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...int, medical technology management in a humans life expectancy can provide the society...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ience, medical technology analysis in a humans life expectancy might increase the cons...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42013800891 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.6917432749 50.4703680194 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.5 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195480291822 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681947141974 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661980585397 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114522812505 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380849025746 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.94827586207 216% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.