Life experience is a better teacher than a school or foreign education. Give an example and support opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of life experience as a better teacher than school or foreign education and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such an issue is thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being a better teacher than the school can be a plus that I will analyze throughout this essay.
From the general standpoint, life experience and foreign education's differences in human lives can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an experiment that discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures are apparent can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the importance of life experience as a better teacher might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of non-creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of life experiences far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of life experie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63921568627 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23447404936 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643137254902 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3984868171 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.727272727 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242393782028 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854575115484 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967100750181 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134602656381 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890206005565 0.0609392437508 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.