Life experience is a better teacher than school or foreign education. Give an example and support opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of life experience and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such an issue is thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being a better teacher than the school can be a plus that I will analyze throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, being better than the foreign education can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an experiment that discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures are apparent can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the importance of life experience as a better teacher might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of non-creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having experiences far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62551440329 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23614345024 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658436213992 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1584343979 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.272727273 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184368120078 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614981618798 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618795219792 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101211292095 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530235586651 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.